Sick LUT3-850 Lumineszenztaster 1012869 Sensor für industriellen Einsatz Sick Handfüllgerät Type/manufacturer number: 6DR4004-1M Z1-994

Sick LUT3-850 Lumineszenztaster 1012869 Sensor für industriellen Einsatz Sick Handfüllgerät Type/manufacturer number: 6DR4004-1M Z1-994

Name: Sick LUT3-850 Lumineszenztaster 1012869 Sensor für industriellen Einsatz Sick Handfüllgerät Type/manufacturer number: 6DR4004-1M Z1-994
Brand: webproci.fr
SKU: 39054007063
Price: 349.50 USD
Availability: InStock
Rating: 4.2061 (20 reviews)

SKU 39054007063 · ★ 4.2

EUR349.50EUR385.50

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $87.38 Learn more

Shipping Estimate
USA

USA

CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Nov 1 - Nov 6

Yard notes

Description

Sick LUT3 850 Lumineszenztaster 1012869 Sensor für industriellen Einsatz Sick Handfüllgerät Type manufacturer number: 6DR4004 1M Z1 994 Type manufacturer number: 6DR4004 1M Hersteller Hiquel Produktart Überwachungsrelais Herstellernummer (MPN) ICP200 400 Zustand Neu Hinweis zur Kompatibilität Manufacturer: Sick Product type: Luminescence button

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

Frequently Asked Questions for Sick LUT3-850 Lumineszenztaster 1012869 Sensor für industriellen Einsatz Sick Handfüllgerät Type/manufacturer number: 6DR4004-1M Z1-994

What should I do when a product description uses unfamiliar terms?

Ask the seller to explain what the term means for this particular offer. Compare the explained function with what you actually need.

What should I check when an offer emphasizes limited time or limited quantity?

Distinguish a product-availability message from a promotion-expiry message. Confirm essential product information before allowing urgency to determine the decision.

What should I check when product images are described as illustrative?

Consider whether the image shows an example outcome rather than contents. Compare alternatives using documented information rather than image style alone.